As the gatekeepers of the literary community, lit agents represent a major hurdle for writers; they are among the first people we need to impress if we wish to enter through those pearly gates into the world of published authors. So it is only natural if we at first view them through rosy-colored glasses.
But literary agents are not the lofty demi-gods they seem at first sight. There are titillating tidbits we should chew on before submitting our work to these gatekeepers.
Literary agents have no formal training. There exists no degree specifically tailored for lit agents to attain. Their schooling is unofficial, comprised of internships and other non-paying time offered as underlings in the literary world, comprised almost entirely of scut work. Their opinions are as biased as anyone else’s, albeit buttressed with a foundation in extreme reading and guided by the opinions of more experienced literary agents. They do not belong to any official group (even the AAR is more a code-of-ethics community and less an official organization) and are not required by law to sign any contracts, purchase any permits, or achieve anything to call themselves Literary Agents.
The point is that these people are merely well-read book-lovers, not the end-all know-all of your manuscript. Just because a few of them reject it, doesn’t mean your MS is no good. So remember, when it comes to books, these literary agents are just as chock full of opinions and preferences as anyone else. They don’t know everything, and they don’t have a framed BL (Bachelors of Literary Critique) to prove otherwise.
My experiences with lit agents have run the gamut: from frustration at their silent neglect, to fury at their form rejections, to elation at receiving requests from them. What have your experiences with them entailed?